Legal Opinion

220 Ingraham LLC v. Woolridge

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided March 30, 2015Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Steven Z. Mostofsky, J.

The parties signed a lease on June 1, 2011 for a basement area at 220 Ingraham Street, in Brooklyn. The lease contained an option that permitted the respondent to renew the lease at a higher rent, on condition it met the original lease obligations.

The petitioner filed this commercial holdover proceeding in November 2014. The court granted respondent permission to serve a late answer by January 16, 2015. It served the answer with affirmative defenses on that date. Respondent subsequently served an amended answer with affirmative defenses and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Probst v. . Rochester Steam Laundry Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. I. B. Realty Corp. v. Holland Furnace Co.Orange County Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API