Advanced Career Technologies, Inc. v. Does
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT DANIEL DRASIN’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES
William J. Martinez, United States District Judge
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Daniel Drasin’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees (“Motion”). (ECF No. 45.) Plaintiff initiated this action on February 5, 2013 alleging violations of the Lanham Act, common law trade libel, and violations of the Colorado Consumer Protection Act. (ECF No. 1.) On January 23, 2015, the Court granted Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss due to lack of personal jurisdiction. (ECF No. 41.) However, the Court gave Plaintiff…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Ramos v. LammCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- American Telephone And Telegraph Company v. Winback And Conserve Program, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Case v. Unified School District No. 233Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dowling v. General Motors, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2019