Wichita & Western Railroad v. Kuhn
Supreme Court of Kansas
Motion for Rehearing. The case is stated in W. & W. Rid. Co. v. Kuhn, ante, p. 104, et seq. The opinion herein was filed at the session of the court in March, 1888.
1Per curiam
On December 10, 1887, this case was decided, and the judgment of the court below was to some extent modified. {W.&W.Rld. Co. v.Kuhn, ante, p. 104; same case, 16 Pac. Rep. 75.) Immediately thereafter the plaintiff in error, defendant below, moved for a rehearing upon the ground that the court below erred in the admission of evidence, and that this court misconstrued such evidence. After a reexamination of the case, we are inclined to think that the plaintiff in error is correct. Among the evidence complained of is the following: The plaintiff below introduced the depo-
*676sitiou of Rufus J. Razey,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cleveland & Pittsburgh Railroad v. BallOhio Supreme Court · 1856
- Central Railroad v. SennSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
- Alabama & Florida R. R. v. BurkettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1868
- Central Branch Union Pacific Railroad v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- Fremont, Elkhorn & Missouri Valley R. R. v. WhalenNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by14 opinions
- Leroy & Western Railroad v. RossSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
- Chicago, Kansas & Western Railroad v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
- Beam v. Farmers Union Mutual Hail InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
- De Wald v. IngleWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Lynch v. PayneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.