Legal Opinion
Mercereau v. M/V WOODBINE
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided November 3, 1982No. Civ. A. C80-2162PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ANN ALDRICH, District Judge.
Plaintiff Emmett Mercereau brought this action against defendants M/V Woodbine and the Andy Machinery Company (hereinafter “Andy”) in order to recover wages and other expenses allegedly due him for services performed on the Woodbine. Mercereau seeks the enforcement of a maritime lien he placed on the Woodbine. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 46 U.S.C. § 971. After trial and presentation of evidence, the Court herewith submits its findings of facts and conclusions of law pursuant to Rule 52 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Findings of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- W. A. Marshall & Co. v. S. S. "President Arthur"Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- The EverosaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1937
- Hercules Co., Inc. v. The Brigadier General Absolom BairdCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- Miami River Boat Yard, Inc. v. 60' Houseboat, Serial Sc-40-2860-3-62Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re H & S Transportation Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1984
- In Re Complaint of Wepfer Marine, Inc. for Exoneration From or Limitation of LiabilityDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2004
- Chase v. MorganDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2025
- Southwest Marine of Samoa, Inc. v. The M/V Kwang Myong 71High Court of American Samoa · 1993