Bales v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
JOY, Justice.
This is a workmen’s compensation case appealed from a summary judgment granted for the defendant in the trial court.
Plaintiff Bales contends that a material issue of fact existed as to (1) Bales “was required and it was necessary for him to use an ingress to his employer’s premises which was a hazardous risk and incidental to his work” and (2) “because he (Bales) was on a special mission”.
The facts as set forth in the record are essentially undisputed. Bales was employed by Wes-Tex Construction Company as a cement finisher. The foreman for Wes-Tex, George Jones, instructed Bales…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lumberman's Reciprocal Ass'n. v. BehnkenTexas Supreme Court · 1922
- Texas General Indemnity Company v. BottomTexas Supreme Court · 1963
- Kirby Lumber Co. v. ScurlockTexas Supreme Court · 1922
- Texas Employers' Insurance v. IngeTexas Supreme Court · 1948
- Employers' Liability Assur. Corp. v. LightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Evans v. Illinois Employers Insurance of WausauTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. ChesnutCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Evans v. Illinois Employers Insurance of WausauTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Rodriguez v. Texas Employer's Insurance Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979