Legal Opinion

Bales v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 20, 1969No. Mo. 7897PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOY, Justice.

This is a workmen’s compensation case appealed from a summary judgment granted for the defendant in the trial court.

Plaintiff Bales contends that a material issue of fact existed as to (1) Bales “was required and it was necessary for him to use an ingress to his employer’s premises which was a hazardous risk and incidental to his work” and (2) “because he (Bales) was on a special mission”.

The facts as set forth in the record are essentially undisputed. Bales was employed by Wes-Tex Construction Company as a cement finisher. The foreman for Wes-Tex, George Jones, instructed Bales…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lumberman's Reciprocal Ass'n. v. BehnkenTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Texas General Indemnity Company v. BottomTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Kirby Lumber Co. v. ScurlockTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Texas Employers' Insurance v. IngeTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Employers' Liability Assur. Corp. v. LightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Evans v. Illinois Employers Insurance of WausauTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. ChesnutCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  3. Evans v. Illinois Employers Insurance of WausauTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Rodriguez v. Texas Employer's Insurance Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API