Bartlett v. Bank of Mannington
West Virginia Supreme Court
Error to Circuit Court, Marion County. Action by Fred W. Bartlett against the Bank of Manning-ton. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
POEFENBARGER, PRESIDENT :
Claiming to have been a surety of the defendant for a certain debt, amounting to $6,500.00 and evidenced by a certain promissory note, the plaintiff obtained a verdict and judgment for the sum of $5,417.18, as for money paid by him, as. such surety, on said debt. The principal assignments of error assume insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict.
*331The history of the debt is somewhat lengthy and is involved in more or less controversy. -Its origin dates back, at least, to April 7, 1902, but the plaintiff, Bartlett did not become connected with it until January…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Halstead v. HortonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
- Gregory's Adm'r v. Ohio River R'dWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
- State v. HenaghanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
- Connolly v. BollingerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
- Lee's Ex'rs v. Virginia & Maryland Bridge Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. BraggWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1955
- Ritz v. KingdonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
- Ritz v. KingdonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
- State v. NobleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1924
- Guyandotte Coal Co. v. Virginian Electric & Machine WorksWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1923
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.