Windhom v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Adams, Judge.
Errol Windhom appeals his conviction of armed robbery. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence; he also contends the trial court erred by not declaring a mistrial following an officer’s testimony, by failing to give seven of his requested jury charges, and by sentencing him in violation of the Georgia and United States Constitutions. We reverse and remand for new trial.
Construed in favor of the verdict, the evidence, including the testimony of co-defendant Christopher Graddick, shows that on May 18, 2009, Graddick, Michael Shane Bedford, and Alex Williams went to the A&Z…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
- White v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Fordham v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Windhom v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- State v. BrewerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Errol M. Windhom v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.