Legal Opinion

In re Donald A.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 3, 1983PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Meyer, J.

The United States Supreme Court having vacated our prior order in this matter and remanded for further consideration in light of its decision in Matter ofR. M. J. (455 US 191), we conclude that there is no constitutional infirmity in the application of section 479 of the Judiciary Law and provisions of the Code of Professional Responsibility to respondents’ conduct in approving the mailing by the legal clinic in which respondents are partners to some 1,000 realtors in the Albany area of a letter quoting fees for listed real estate transactions. The order of the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Police Dept. of Chicago v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Carey v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re DamonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  2. In re Von WiegenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API