State v. Wilson
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from Circuit Court, Perkinis County. Hon. Raymond E. Dirrman, Judge. The defendant, William ■ Wilson, .was oonvilctedl of the crime ■of rape, and he appeals. (i)To pioirut one of the opinion, Appellant cited: Code Gnim. Free. Sacs. 225, 229, 230, 569; Stale v. Syisinger, 25 S. D'. no, 125 N. W. 879; State v. Pennington, 41 W. Va. 601, 23 S. E. 9x8; Conrad v. State, 65 Ark. 559, 47 S. W. 628; Arrington v. Co., 87 Va. 96, 12 S. E. 224, 10 L. R. A. 242.
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOY, J.
Appellant was convicted- of the crime of statutory naipe, and brings tire cause before this court on appeal. Tire sufficiency ictf the evidence is not questioned. The only questions presented relate to certain rulings and inistnuictions of ¡the trial court.
[1] By demurrer and motion in arrest of judgment appellant questions the sufficiency of the information. The offense is alleged to have been committed! “on between tire 1st day of March, 1915, and! the 1st day of July, 1915.” Appellant contends that this; designation pf time is so uncertain and indefinite that he could not adequately…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. StimpsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1905
- Plunkett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
- State v. OttoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
- Roth v. BoiesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. SwallowSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. MurraySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926