State v. Faribault Waterworks Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Rice county, Buckham, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the Court
COLLINS, J.2
It was said in County of Washington v. German-American Bank, 28 Minn. 360, 10 N. W. 21, that:
“There is no statute authorizing an appeal like the present from a tax judgment. The only mode of reviewing such judgments is upon a certificate or statement of the facts and of its decision, by the court below, in the manner prescribed by statute. G. S. 1878, c. 11, § 80.”
This language is pertinent in this case, which is an appeal from an •order denying a new trial after findings of fact and an order for judgment in favor of the state had been filed in proceedings to enforce the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. RandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- County of Washington v. German-American BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. Several Parcels of LandNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
- State v. Griffith & SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- State ex rel. Kane v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904