Louise Rebuck and Jack Wicker, and Otoe County, Nebraska v. Arthur Vogel, Jr., and Atchison County, Missouri
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Per curiam
Title was quieted in Arthur Vogel, Jr. in land on the north of the present channel of the Missouri River, the district court 1 finding that he had been in open, notorious and exclusive adverse possession under a claim of right of all of it since 1931. The unsuccessful plaintiffs, Louise Rebuck and Jack Wicker, appeal, arguing that the district court erred in denying their request to introduce new evidence after the memorandum decision entered by the court, and that the district court erred as a matter of law in finding Vogel’s adverse possession. Other claims of error are made, essentially…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lawrence J. Holt v. Robert Sarver, Commissioner of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Paul M. Drefke, United States of America v. Richard O. JamesonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- Pioneer Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Harry Gelt, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
3Cited by22 opinions
- Sil-Flo, Inc. v. SFHC, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Cross-Appellee v. Sears, Roebuck & Company, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Ohio-Sealy Mattress Manufacturing Co. v. Sealy Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- MacWhorter v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
- Pelican Production Corp. v. MarinoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.