Legal Opinion

Blake v. New York City Housing Authority

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarold J. Crawford, J.

Plaintiffs, an 11-year-old infant and his mother, have moved to strike from defendant’s answer the defense of Statute of Limitations.

On April 16, 1961, the infant plaintiff was allegedly involved in an accident. On July 11,1961, plaintiffs served the defendant with a notice of claim for personal injuries, loss of services and medical expenses. On July 14, 1961, the defendant served plaintiffs’ attorney with a notice requiring the plaintiffs’ appearance on July 26, 1961, for an oral and physical examination. Prior to this date, the attorney for the defendant consented to plaintiffs’ request…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Russo v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Amex Asphalt Corporation v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  3. Woodcrest Construction Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947
  4. Tilinsky v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  5. Lawrence v. Rochester Housing AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Robinson v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  2. Martello v. Board of EducationCivil Court of the City of New York · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API