Legal Opinion
United States Security Warehouse, Inc. v. Brooks
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided May 19, 1967No. 42504PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Panneul, Judge.
1. Where the only relevancy of a difficulty is to show the state of feelings between the parties, the fact of the difficulty may be admissible but its particulars are not. Carter v. Dixon, 69 Ga. 82 (7); Eugee v. State, 159 Ga. 604 (11) (126 SE 471); McDuffie v. State, 121 Ga. 580 (7) (49 SE 708). It follows, therefore, that the letter which the defendant sought to introduce in evidence, and which went into the particulars of the difficulty between the witness and the defendant, was properly excluded.
2. “ ‘In all cases of bailment, after proof of loss, the burden of proof is on…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- McDuffie v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Carter v. DixonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
- Eugee v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Heidt v. Southern Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Scott v. Purser Truck Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- South Georgia Pecan Co. v. Alimenta Processing Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Mitzner v. HymanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Mitzner v. HymanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985