Legal Opinion
Mullen v. Zoebe, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 13, 1994PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rutledge, J.), dated April 4, 1991, as granted the branch of the motion of the defendants Zoebe, Inc., Zoe Geraldine Brown, and Ronberg Corp., which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The defendants Zoebe, Inc., Zoe Geraldine Brown, and Ronberg Corp. cross appeal, as limited by their notice of appeal and brief, from so much of the same order as denied the branch of their motion which was for costs and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Bittrolff v. Ho's Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Pharm v. LituchyNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Farragher v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Farragher v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fisher v. BraunAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Matthews v. TobiasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Polanco v. Creston Avenue Properties, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Lockensky v. Town of ClarkstownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Quintero v. MBH Capital, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.