Legal Opinion

Kruegel v. Berry

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 13, 1888No. 6018PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Dallas. Tried below before Hon. Geo. N. Aldredge. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

ACKER, Presiding Judge.

On the 15th day of January, 1880, appellant leased from appellee Berry an unimproved lot in the city of Dallas for a term of two years, and soon thereafter went into possession and built a shop on the lot.

The contract of lease contained the following stipulations and agreements:

“And it is agreed and understood that the party of the second part shall own all improvements that he may place or build thereon, and. have the privilege to remove the same at the expiration of the said two years. * * * And it is further agreed to and understood by the party of the first part…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Thermo Products Co. v. Chilton Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1983
  2. Carter v. FrakesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
  3. Boone v. Herald News Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1901
  4. Blaffer Farish v. Gulf Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. Grisham v. LoweryCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API