Legal Opinion

Sweeney v. Cross

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 5, 1972No. 6208PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PRESLAR, Justice.

Appellant-Plaintiff, Jeri Sweeney, brought suit against W. A. “Dub” Cross, d/b/a Cross Answering Service, Appellee-Defendant, alleging an existing contract between the two parties whereby Appellee was to purchase Appellant’s telephone answering service. The trial Court upon Defendant-Appellee’s motion, withdrew the case from the jury and granted judgment for Apoellee. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

*465The record reflects that Appellant was the owner and operator of a small telephone answering service in Midland consisting of approximately “32 customers”.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stanfield v. O'BOYLETexas Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Page & Wirtz Construction Co. v. Van Doran Bri-Tico Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  3. J. C. Engelman, Inc. v. Sanders Nursery Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  4. Smulcer v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  5. Browne Grain Co. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Willowood Condominium Association, Inc. v. Hnc Realty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  2. Myers v. Ginsburg, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
  3. Plasmacam, Inc. v. Cncelectronics, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
  4. Aerospatiale Helicopter Corp. v. Universal Health Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
  5. Aerospatiale Helicopter Corp. v. Universal Health Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API