Legal Opinion
Coppola v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 28, 2001No. 5D01-2360PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
795 So.2d 258 (2001)
Samuel A. COPPOLA, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D01-2360.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
September 28, 2001.
Loren D. Rhoton of Rhoton & Hayman, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.
No Appearance for Appellee.
PALMER, J.
Samuel Coppola appeals the denial of his rule 3.850 motion, claiming that he is entitled to relief under Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000).[1] The trial court denied relief, finding that Coppola's motion was untimely in that it was filed more than two years after Coppola's sentence became final and, in the alternative, because…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Heggs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Murphy v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Regan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Coppola v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
- Honeycutt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Carvello v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Cox v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Miller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.