Legal Opinion
Smelt v. County of Orange
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 5, 2006No. 05-56040PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
447 F.3d 673
Arthur Bruno SMELT; Christopher David Hammer, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
COUNTY OF ORANGE, California; County Clerk, for the County of Orange; Michael Rodrian, in his official capacity as State Registrar of Vital Statistics, California Department of Health Services; United States of America; Defendants-Appellees,
Proposition 22 Legal Defense and Education Fund; Campaign for California Families, Defendant-Intervenors-Appellees.
No. 05-56040.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted April 4, 2006.
Filed May 5, 2006.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Richard C. Gilbert,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Andersen v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2006