Brinson v. City of Mulberry
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtBuford, C.J.
—This was a suit against the City of Mulberry for damages alleged to have been sustained by the dangero'us condition of a public street in said municipality. It appears from the record that there was a narrow paved street in such municipality passing between two large and deep pits which had been excavated in the mining of phosphate and which had been left open and were, to some extent, filled with water. The street was paved a width of about 14 feet and had shoulders between two and three feet wide on each side and on the outside of each shoulder there had in some time past been constructed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sutton v. City of SnohomishWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Stockton Automobile Co. v. ConferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Roberts v. . Town of EatonNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Derosia v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. OysterNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Tamarac v. GarcharDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- City of Hialeah v. RevelsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
- Potts v. MulliganSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
- Tampa Shipbuilding & Engineering Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
- Blossom Heath Operating Co. v. PipkinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.