Legal Opinion

Rankin v. Helms

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 10, 1956No. 168Published

1Opinion of the Court

94 S.E.2d 651 (1956)

244 N.C. 532

Richard E. RANKIN

v.

Ray T. HELMS, trading as Heims Construction Company.

No. 168.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 10, 1956.

Basil L. Whitener, Gastonia, and Warren C. Stack, Charlotte, for defendant, appellant.

R. G. Cherry, Gastonia, and Frank Battley Rankin, Mount Holly, for plaintiff, appellee.

PARKER, Justice.

Plaintiff offered evidence, which was admitted by the court over 31 objections and exceptions by the defendant based upon the ground that the evidence violated the parol evidence rule, to this effect: Plaintiff made a verbal contract with defendant…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Evans v. Freeman.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Mills v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Neal v. MarroneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Mills v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance v. MoreheadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API