Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Wiley

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 2003No. 2002-SC-0180-DGPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Justice JOHNSTONE.

The sole issue raised in this appeal is whether Appellant, Charles Barnett, and Appellee, Laura Wiley, were an “unmarried couple” within the meaning of KRS 408.720, so that Wiley could obtain a Domestic Violence Order (“DVO”) against Barnett. We hold that they were not an “unmarried couple,” as defined in KRS 403.720(3) and, therefore, we reverse the Court of Appeals.

On February 21, 2000, Wiley petitioned the Franklin Circuit Court to enter a DVO against Barnett. In the petition, she alleged that Barnett approached her car, banged on the window,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beckham v. Bd. of Educ. of Jefferson Cty.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. KelloggSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  3. Brown v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1999

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Caudill v. CaudillCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2010
  2. State v. AnkenyMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Gomez v. GomezCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2008
  4. Castle v. CastleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2019
  5. Wright v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API