Legal Opinion
Clarke v. Chicago, B. & Q. R.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 19, 1932No. Nos. 656-658PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.
This court, in Clarke v. Boysen, 39 F.(2d) 800, held that John T. and Ella R. Clarke were liable for the abatement of a public and private nuisance, which consisted of a superstructure on the Boysen Dam in Wyoming. Decrees were made, and sent to the lower court to be entered, requiring the Clarkes to abate the nuisance within a period of six months. The decrees were entered on June 17, 1930, by Judge Kennedy, United States Judge for the District of Wyoming, who had voluntarily held himself disqualified to try the canses. The Clarkes failed to comply with these decrees,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re Sanford Fork & Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Guardian Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
- In Re Washington & Georgetown RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Buffington v. HarveySupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Clarke v. BoysenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Zahn v. HudspethCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- United States v. ManningDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1963
- John Richard Burrup and Jay Melvin Burrup v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- Matrix Properties Corp. v. TAG INVESTMENTSNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- In the Matter of Edmond C. Fletcher on a Charge of Criminal Contempt. Appeal by Edmond C. FletcherCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.