Legal Opinion

Maywood Proviso State Bank v. Village of Berkeley

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 7, 1965No. Gen. 49,672PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ME. PEESIDING JUSTICE DEMPSEY

delivered the opinion of the court.

The defendant, Village of Berkeley, appeals from a judgment which declared the village’s zoning ordinance unconstitutional and void in its application to certain property held in trust by the plaintiff, May-wood Proviso State Bank, under which trust the plaintiff, Warren Swiech, has the sole beneficial interest.

The plaintiff’s complaint raised constitutional questions which were sustained by the trial court’s decision and the appeal, accordingly, was first directed to the Supreme Court. The court evidently was of the opinion that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. La Salle National Bank v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Bolger v. Village of Mount ProspectIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Urann v. Village of HinsdaleIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Reeve v. Village of GlenviewIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Westfield v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. ValentineAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  2. Rubi v. 49'er Country Club Estates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  3. Chicago & NW Ry. Co. v. City of Des PlainesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  4. La Salle National Bank v. Village of PalatineAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  5. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API