Legal Opinion

Rowan v. Sauls

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1953PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Prewitt

This is a suit resulting from an automobile collision by a F'ord car driven by the defendant Flak and a truck, on a four lane highway just east of the city limits of Memphis.

There is no point in stating the facts as to how the accident occurred, or going into the question of negligence of Flak, because that negligence was settled by the verdict of the jury. Verdicts and judgments thereon were entered against Henry Flak and William Albert Rowan in the sum of $7,500 in each case.

The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment as to William Albert Rowan on the ground that there was substantial…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. V. L. Nicholson Const. Co. v. LaneTennessee Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Piquet Et Ux. v. WazelleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Kenyon v. HathawayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. Owens v. Carmichael's U-Drive Autos, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Brown v. FieldsOregon Supreme Court · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brown v. HarkleroadCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1955
  2. Parrish v. YeiserCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1955
  3. Dukes v. McGimseyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1973
  4. McCarty v. PurserCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  5. Barrett v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API