Legal Opinion

People v. Burgess

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 16, 1988No. H002975; No. H003998PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HANING,

J.—Vernon Lee Burgess appeals his conviction by jury trial of possession of stolen property (Pen. Code, § 496);1 grand theft (§§ 484/487, subd. 3); offering to sell PCP (Health & Saf. Code, § 11379.5); and robbery (§ 211). His primary contention is that the substitution of a regular juror with an alternate constituted double jeopardy. He has also petitioned for habeas corpus, claiming that his trial counsel’s failure to formally enter a plea of former jeopardy (§ 1016, subd. 5) deprived him of the effective assistance of counsel. We affirm the judgment and deny the petition.

Since…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. BurgessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API