Janeway v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
We read the findings of the Tax Court taken together with its opinion 1 as saying that, as a matter of fact, all the payments made by the taxpayers to the corporation were capital contributions of such character that, as against any third persons (such as, e.g., persons contracting with the corporation) the taxpayers would have to be regarded as stockholders and nothing else. As the Tax Court’s conclusion rests upon a determination of fact supported by substantial evidence, 2 we cannot disturb it, even under a restricted interpretation of Dobson v. Commissioner, 320 U.S.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dobson v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Emerald Oil Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- Buckminster's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Flynn v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
- California Iron Yards Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Estate of Travis Mixon, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- John v. Rowan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Jean C. Tyler and Dolly Ann Tyler v. Laurie W. Tomlinson, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Smith v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
- Matthiessen v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.