Legal Opinion
Baldridge v. Inter-River Drainage District of Missouri
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided December 6, 1982No. 12605PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PREWITT, Judge.
Respondent, the widow of Edsel Bal-dridge, filed a claim for workmen’s (now workers’) compensation benefits for his death, and received an award from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. The circuit court affirmed the award and defendant appeals. It contends that the Labor and Industrial Commission erred in making the award to respondent because there was no substantial or competent evidence † > show that the deceased was killed by an ‘ accident arising out of and in the course of his employment”. See § 287.120.-1, RSMo 1978.
Courts disturb an award of the Commission…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Corp. v. Joplin Cement CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- Kunce v. Junge Baking CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
- Kowalski v. MG Metals and Sales, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Gingell v. Walters Contracting CorporationMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
- Miller v. Sleight & Hellmuth Ink Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1969
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- McClain v. Welsh Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. OrgonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Custer v. Hartford Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Ellis v. Western Electric Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Anderson v. Emerson Electric Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.