Legal Opinion

Brilmyer v. University of Chicago

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided May 5, 2006No. Civil Action 04-40258-FDSPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

SAYLOR, District Judge.

This is a dispute arising from an attempted change of enrollment in a long-term disability plan. The plan at issue was provided to plaintiff Karen L. Brilmyer as a benefit of her employment with defendant University of Chicago. Defendant The Standard Insurance Company is the claims administrator and insurer. The matter arises under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq.

I. Background

A. The Parties and the LTD Plan

Karen L. Brilmyer was employed by the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Leahy v. Raytheon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  3. Richard Drinkwater v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  4. Orndorf v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  5. Liston v. Unum Corp. Officer Severance PlanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API