Legal Opinion

Arnold I. Kramer v. O.C. Jenkins, Warden, and United States Parole Commission

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 11, 1986No. 86-1849PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

We write in brief amplification of our order of July 7 (which the petitioner has asked us to reconsider) denying bail pending our review of the district court’s order denying a petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Our order was based on Cherek v. United States, 767 F.2d 335 (7th Cir.1985), where we held that, although a federal district judge has the power to admit to bail petitioners for postconviction collateral relief (such as habeas corpus for state prisoners, 28 U.S.C. § 2254, or the habeas corpus substitute for federal prisoners, 28 U.S.C. § 2255), the power is “to be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Leonard R. Cherek v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Arnold I. Kramer v. O.C. Jenkins, Warden, and United States Parole Commission, RespondentsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  2. Arnold I. Kramer v. O.C. Jenkins, Warden, and United States Parole Commission, RespondentsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  3. Bunten, Christopher v. Tegels, LizzieDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2021
  4. Cursey v. OlsonDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2025
  5. Debra Christie v. Nona T. SwitalaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API