Construction Technology, Inc. v. Lockformer Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MARTIN, Jr., District Judge:
This matter is before the Court on three motions brought by certain defendants in the above-referenced actions. A fourth motion, brought by defendant The Lockformer Company, Inc. (“Lockformer”), for summary judgment as to the validity of the patents at issue in this litigation is addressed in a separate Opinion of the Court.
With respect to defendant Met-Coil Systems Corp.’s motion for summary judgment, the motion is denied. The record presents factual issues as to the extent of the knowledge Metcoil had as a result of the supervision its…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Diamond v. DiehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Halliburton Company v. Schlumberger Technology CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Modine Manufacturing Company, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. The Allen Group, Inc., D/B/A the G & O Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Carman Industries, Inc. v. Eugene A. Wahl and Vibra Screw, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Kori Corporation v. Wilco Marsh Buggies And Draglines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Schipani v. McLeodCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Met-Coil Systems Corp. v. Columbia Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994
- Bigelow v. Acands, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Whalen v. Kawasaki Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Chemtron, Inc. v. Aqua Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1993