Legal Opinion

Walter Brewing Co. v. Hoder

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 9, 1951No. 16252PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hilliard

A case involving an oral contract, and a subsequent oral modification thereof. More particularly, the controversy involves the modification feature. Plaintiff Hoder, defendant in error, as successor to earlier parties in interest, and defendant, Walter Brewing Company, plaintiff in error, will be referred to as designated in the court below, where plaintiff enjoyed favorable verdict and judgment. Plaintiff, as well as his predecessors in interest, resided in El Paso county, while defendant, a corporation, has its principal place of business and general offices in Pueblo county.

It is not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Maxwell-Chamberlain Motor Co. v. PiattSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
  2. Progressive Mutual Insurance v. MihooverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
  3. Chutkow v. Wagman Realty & InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  4. Navy Gas & Supply Co. v. SchoechSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
  5. Karsten v. RootSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cycles, Ltd. v. W.J. Digby, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  2. Watson v. SettlemeyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
  3. City & County of Denver v. Fey Concert Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  4. City & County of Denver v. Fey Concert Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  5. Cycles, Ltd. v. W.J. Digby, Inc., Cycles, Limited, Dale Yeager, Vida Donez Yeager, Dale Yeager, Jr. And Sheila Yeager Hendrix v. W.J. Digby, Inc., 1776 Corporation, James F. Digby, Donald Digby and George SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API