Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Hall v. LeFevre

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 12, 1983PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.

Where the only remedy sought is a new trial or appeal and not immediate release from custody, habeas corpus is an improper remedy (People ex rel. Douglas v Vincent, 50 NY2d 901). Here the only claim in the petition that could result in release is that because relator suffers from epilepsy imprisonment constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. There being no allegation that the prison officials have been deliberately indifferent to relator’s medical heeds, however, the writ was properly…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. People ex rel. Douglas v. VincentNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Davis v. CoombeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. People ex rel. Thomas v. LeFevreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. People ex rel. Nelson v. ScullyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. People ex rel. Brady v. ScullyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. People ex rel. Phifer v. ScullyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API