Legal Opinion

Systematics, Inc. v. Forge Square Associates Ltd. Partnership

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 8, 1997No. AC 15817PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LANDAU, J.

The defendant third party plaintiff, Construction Services of Bristol, Inc. (Construction Services), by its cross complaint, sought to foreclose a mechanic’s lien on property owned by Forge Square Associates Limited Partnership (Forge).1 The defendant state of Connecticut filed an answer and special defenses and subsequently filed a motion for summary judgment on Construction Services’s cross complaint. The trial court granted the state’s motion for summary judgment and Construction Services appealed to this court.2 While that appeal to this court was pending, Seaboard…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re Baby Girl B.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. Grayson v. GraysonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  3. Grayson v. GraysonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. Misinonile v. MisinonileSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  5. O'Leary v. Industrial Park Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fairfield Merrittview Ltd. Partnership v. NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  2. Systematics, Inc. v. Forge Square Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API