Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Department of Employment Security

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided April 24, 1987No. 860284-CAPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

2Per curiam

In the above case, plaintiffs counsel filed with this Court a “docketing statement” that does not comply with Rule 9 of the Rules of the Utah Court of Appeals. The statement filed fails to set forth any statutory authority or rule which properly confers jurisdiction upon this Court., Other information required by Rule 9 is also lacking and necessary documents are not attached. R. Utah Ct.App. 9(d).

Docketing statements must fully comply with Rule 9. Failure to comply will result in dismissal of the appeal, particularly when counsel ignores our request that the statement…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hayes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API