Legal Opinion
State v. Mitchell, 2006 Ca 53 (7-13-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided July 13, 2007No. 2006 CA 53PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Appellant, Christina Mitchell, appeals a judgment of the Clark County Common Pleas Court sentencing her to eight years in prison. Mitchell asserts that her resentencing, pursuant to the mandate inState v. Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1, 2006-Ohio-856, 845 N.E.2d 470, was improper because it retroactively applied sentencing laws in violation of her due process rights and her right to be free from ex post facto laws. For the reasons articulated by this court in State v. Burkhart, Champaign App. No. 2006-CA-18, 2007-Ohio-3436, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
{¶ 2} On April 11,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- State v. Burkhart, 06ca18 (6-29-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. Latham, 07-Ca-23 (9-19-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. Montgomery, 22091 (4-4-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. Smith, 21885 (11-30-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. Vanover, 2007 Ca 30 (9-19-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. Jordan, 2006-Ca-0106 (12-28-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007