Roosevelt v. Schermerhorn
New York Supreme Court
Motion for a retaxation of costs.
1Opinion of the CourtBischoff, J.
As heretofore held by me (Dean v. Booth, N. Y. L. J., July 7, 1900, Special Term, Part I), this motion for a retaxation should be granted upon the ground that the general answer of an infant suffices to raise an issue of fact sufficient for the purposes of taxation of a trial fee and costs after notice of trial where the answer necessitated the plaintiff’s proof of his-cause of action.
*288The definition of issues as found in sections 963 and 964 of the Code, is confined to issues arising on the pleadings and for -the purposes of the chapter of the Code relating to the method of trial. § 963.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bennett v. . Leeds Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Place v. Butternuts Woolen & Cotton Manufacturing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1864
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wandell v. HirschfeldNew York Supreme Court · 1903
- Pines v. HeaslipNew York Supreme Court · 1917