Legal Opinion

Roosevelt v. Schermerhorn

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1900PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion for a retaxation of costs.

1Opinion of the CourtBischoff, J.

As heretofore held by me (Dean v. Booth, N. Y. L. J., July 7, 1900, Special Term, Part I), this motion for a retaxation should be granted upon the ground that the general answer of an infant suffices to raise an issue of fact sufficient for the purposes of taxation of a trial fee and costs after notice of trial where the answer necessitated the plaintiff’s proof of his-cause of action.

*288The definition of issues as found in sections 963 and 964 of the Code, is confined to issues arising on the pleadings and for -the purposes of the chapter of the Code relating to the method of trial. § 963.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bennett v. . Leeds Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Place v. Butternuts Woolen & Cotton Manufacturing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wandell v. HirschfeldNew York Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Pines v. HeaslipNew York Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API