Legal Opinion

Schaick v. Bank of Yorktown

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1934Published

1Opinion of the CourtMcCook, J.

The facts are substantially undisputed. This action relates to two notes, one for $5,000, the other $25,000. On or about the 1st day of December, 1931, the defendant bank arranged to give one Zimels a loan in the sum of $5,000. The note was executed by Zimels, was due April 4, 1932, and a deposit was made in the bank. This1 borrower gave as collateral security a bond furnished by the Lexington Surety and Indemnity Company, which bond was protected by a time deposit made by that company in the defendant bank. The bond is brief and reads as follows:

“ Know dll men by these presents, that we,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Douglass v. HowlandNew York Supreme Court · 1840
  2. Brown v. . CurtissNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
  3. Wheeler v. . WarnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  4. First National Bank v. JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Westchester Mortgage Co. v. Thomas B. McIntire, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API