Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Tennison

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 30, 1973No. 12042Published

1Dissent

SHANNON, Justice.

I dissent.

Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 6252-19, § 18(b), provides, as to premise defects, that “. . . the unit of government shall owe to any claimant only the duty owed by private persons to a licensee on private property . . .” The question in the case is then, one of defining the duty owed by the licensor to a licensee.

*223The trial court concluded, and the majority of this Court has agreed, that the duty to warn a licensee of a condition on the premises arises if the . . licensee knows or has reason to know of the condition and should realize that it involves an unreasonable…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Renfro Drug Co. v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Pickard v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Carlisle v. J. Weingarten, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Berger v. ShapiroSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API