Legal Opinion

Sweeney v. Chicago Telephone Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1904PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Motion to dismiss writ of error.

1Judgment of the CourtJustice Cartwright

In this case the plaintiff in error, Michael Sweeney, sued out a writ of error from this court to the county court of Lake county to review a proceeding in vacation before the judge of that court, on petition of the defendant in error, the Chicago Telephone Company, to condemn a right of way for its telephone line. The defendant in error has moved to dismiss the writ of error on the ground that the judgment can not be reviewed by that means.

The proceeding was in vacation under the provisions of the Eminent Domain act, and that act makes no provision for review of the record by means of a writ…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sanitary District of Chicago v. ChapinIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  2. County of Cook v. MalysaIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Superior Coal Co. v. O'BrienIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Elbert v. ScottSupreme Court of Delaware · 1914
  5. Phelps v. Board of AppealsIllinois Supreme Court · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API