Legal Opinion

United States v. Leo Spangelet

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 1, 1958No. 25127_1PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HINCKS, Circuit Judge.

The defendant appeals after a conviction on counts of smuggling and conspiracy to smuggle.

The major point raised on appeal is the trial court’s refusal to follow the procedure set forth in Jencks v. United States, 353 U.S. 657, 77 S.Ct. 1007, 1 L.Ed.2d 1103, when the defendant’s counsel requested to see the grand jury testimony of the major government witness during that witness’s cross-examination. The district judge held that neither Jencks nor the statute enacted by Congress immediately after the Jencks decision, 18 U.S.C.A. § 3500, authorized handing over grand jury…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Victor Harry Feguer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  3. United States v. Klinghoffer Bros. Realty Corp., Irving Jacobson and Albert KlinghofferCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  4. United States v. Salvatore AnnunziatoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  5. United States v. SantoreCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API