Legal Opinion

Dolomite Products Co. v. Kipers

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1963PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDomenick L. Gabrielli, J.

The petitioner is and has been engaged in the business of stone quarrying since its incorporation in 19'20. It further appears that since 1925, when it acquired the premises in question, the petitioner had conducted the business of crushing, blasting, quarrying and preparing for market, stone, rock and other substances. It is conceded that these operations were conducted on one parcel of the entire premises involved since the time the whole of the premises were purchased in 1925; but, there is serious dispute as to whether these operations had been conducted on the balance of the land…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Barry v. O'ConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. Matter of Elite Dairy Products v. Ten EyckNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. Defelice v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  5. Town of Somers v. CamarcoNew York Court of Appeals · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United Citizens v. Zoning Board of AppealsNew York Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Avelli v. Town of BabylonNew York Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Melville v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Melville v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API