Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Northern Pacific Railroad Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 20, 1887PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Wadena •county, Baxter, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

Gilfillan, C. J.1

Action for running upon and killing plaintiffs borse. Tbe horse was at large in a public highway, grazing near the crossing of defendant’s road, when, a train of cars coming along at its usual speed, the horse ran upon the track, in front of the train, and the train ran upon and killed it. It does not appear that the electors of the town had determined where cattle, horses, etc., should be permitted to go at large. The horse was therefore wrongfully in the highway. It is doubtful that the evidence as to the defendant’s negligence, and also as to contributory negligence on the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Christenson v. American Express Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1870
  2. Witherell v. Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1878

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bostwick v. Minneapolis & Pacific Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Bishop v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Hohl v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  4. Corbett v. Great Northern Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Stacey v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API