Rennebaum v. Atkinson & Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Cash 51 — RULE ON CIRCUIT JUDGE TO ENTER JUDGMENT FOR DAMAGES in support of his application for a rule against the circuit judge, cited: Watson v. Avery, 3 Busk, 635; Gorham v. Luckett, 6 B. Mon., 638; Smith v. Cochran, 7 Bush, 555; Scott v: Scott, 9 Bush, 175. filed a response to the rale nisi, and the appellees’ motion to make the rule absolute was thereupon denied.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE DuRELLE
delivered the opinion oe the court.
By the judgment of the circuit court it was adjudged that Atkinson & Co. were the owners of certain described property then in possession of the defendant, A. EL Rennebaum, and “that said property be by the said Rennebaum returned to the plaintiffs, if a return can be had; if not to be had, then the court adjudges that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant, A. H, Rennebaum, the sum of $800, the value of said property as found by the jury. The court further adjudges that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant, A. EL Rennebaum, the sum of $100…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Smith v. CochranCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1870
3Cited by8 opinions
- St. Louis-S. F. R. Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Cunningham v. Clay's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
- Kelley v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
- Bell's Trustee v. City of LexingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
- Webb v. HarringtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.