Legal Opinion

Daniels v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 28, 1923No. 7565PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMorrow, P. J.

Conviction is for the unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquor; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of one year.

The motion of the state to dismiss the appeal must be sustained, for the reason that the document denominated a recognizance is, in fact, a mere appearance bond, complying in no respect with the terms of the statute prescribing the requisites of a recognizance or bond on appeal. See Code of Crim. Proc. arts. 903 and 904, also Staten v. State, 93 Tex. Cr. R. 265, 246 S. W. 387, and eases therein collated.

The appeal is dismissed.

On Reinstatement of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Conger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  2. Staten v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API