Legal Opinion

Windham v. Sanders

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 14, 1985PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

This is a direct appeal from a master-in-equity’s order in a case referred to him for final judgment. The transcript of record does not indicate that a direct appeal was authorized by order of the circuit court or by written consent of the parties at the time the order of reference was entered. See S. C. Code Ann. § 14-11-90 (Supp. 1984); Precision Power Co., Inc. v. Adams, 283 S. C. 553, 325 S. E. (2d) 59 (1983); Long v. *171Ehni, 283 S. C. 554, 325 S. E. (2d) 319 (1983); Glass v. Glass, 278 S. C. 527, 299 S. E. (2d) 693 (1983).

The appellate record must affirmatively show the proper taking…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Glass v. GlassSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  2. Long v. EhniSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  3. Precision Power Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Karl Sitte Plumbing Co. v. Darby Development Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
  2. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  3. Milgroom v. McDanielSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  4. Murray Properties Partnership v. L. P. Cox Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  5. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API