Legal Opinion

B. Dahlenburg Bonar, P.S.C. v. Waite, Schneider, Bayless & Chesley Co.

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 2012No. 2010-SC-000087-DGPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Justice CUNNINGHAM.

This matter involves a dispute over attorney’s fees. Appellants, Barbara D. Bonar and her law firm, B. Dahlenburg Bonar, P.S.C. (collectively, “Bonar”), claim entitlement to a portion of the attorney’s fees awarded in the class action settlement of Doe v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Covington, Appellees are Waite, Schneider, Bayless and Chesley Co., L.P.A.; Stanley M. Chesley; and Robert A. Steinberg (collectively, ‘WSBC”). Bonar and WSBC initiated the Doe action as co-counsel. However, after the case was certified as a class action, but before the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. v. ThompsonKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Hofreiter v. LeighAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  3. Lofton v. Fairmont Specialty Insurance Managers, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Taylor v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2010

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Southern Financial Life Insurance Co. v. CombsKentucky Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Cobell Ex Rel. Cobell v. JewellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  3. Guy v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  4. Hughes and Coleman, Pllc v. Ann Clark Chambers of the Estate of James W. ChambersKentucky Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Bonar v. Kentucky Bar Ass'nKentucky Supreme Court · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API