Legal Opinion

Armour Bailey v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 19, 1963No. 7466_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

For the second time appellant is here seeking relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 from a sentence imposed under 18 U.S.C. § 2113. The trial court, without a hearing, denied relief. On his prior application appellant contended that his guilty plea was not made voluntarily and understanding^. The trial court held to the contrary and we affirmed. Bailey v. United States, 10 Cir., 312 F.2d 679.

Appellant now contends that the sentence should be vacated because the prosecution followed an illegal arrest and search. We have held to the contrary in a case brought by a codefendant. See Sullivan v. United…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jimmie Wayne Sullivan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
  2. Armour Bailey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Melvin Leroy Mahler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  2. United States v. Donald Edward DonohoeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  3. Von Pickrell v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  4. United States v. Stephen L. SoltowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  5. The PEOPLE v. ThomasIllinois Supreme Court · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API