Chandler v. Juestel
District Court, N.D. Indiana
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION KYLE CHANDLER, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CAUSE NO.: 3:24-CV-438-JVB-AZ ) MARNE JUESTEL, KIM PFLUGHAUPT, ) DEANNA J. LAUGHLIN, HOPE STEEL- ) DOVE, ) Defendants. ) OPINION AND ORDER Kyle Chandler, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a complaint. (ECF 1). “A document filed pro se is to be liberally construed, and a pro se complaint, however inartfully pleaded, must be held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.” Erickson v. Pardus,
551 U.S. 89, 94
(2007) (quotation marks and citations omitted).…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Herbert L. Board v. Karl Farnham, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Jackson v. KotterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.