Legal Opinion

Kirkland v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 2, 2016No. 09-14-00308-CRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHARLES KREGER, Justice

David Charles Kirkland was charged by indictment with fraudulent use of identifying information. Kirkland pled guilty to the charged offense without an agreed recommendation as to punishment;' After a punishment hearing, the trial court assessed punishment at five years of imprisonment. On appeal, Kirkland contends the trial court erred in assessing attorney fees .against him. We modify the judg*381ment of the trial court to delete the assessment of attorney fees and affirm the judgment as modified.

I. Background

Kirkland was arrested for fraudulent use of identifying…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mayer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
  2. Wiley, Sam Jr.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
  3. Banks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Perez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2009
  5. Paul David Wolfe v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Eric Ray-Martin Thibodeaux v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2024
  2. Walter Phillip Schumann, Sr. v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API