Legal Opinion

Salisbury v. Ryon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1905PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts; pursuant to section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

1Opinion of the Court

O’Brien, J.:

The plaintiffs, as executors of Henry E. Salisbury, demand the specific performance of a contract by which the defendant agreed to purchase of them certain real estate. The defendant claims that the plaintiffs cannot convey a marketable title thereto, because no-power of sale is given them as executors under the will, and he demands the return of the amount paid by him on the purchase; price of $3,000 and the expenses of searching the title.

The sole question,- therefore, presented by the submission is; whether the plaintiffs can convey a marketable title, and this depends on the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fleming v. . BurnhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Greenblatt v. . HermannNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Cahill v. . RussellNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Felix v. DevlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  5. Livingston v. MurrayThe Superior Court of New York City · 1869

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Empire Realty Corp. v. SayreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  2. Remsen v. WingertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  3. Lowenfeld v. DitchettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  4. Cook v. SackettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  5. Friedbar Realty Corp. v. SanfordNew York Supreme Court · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API